To identify and describe the content of templates for reporting prehospital major incident medical management.Systematic literature review according to PRISMA guidelines.PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus and Web of Knowledge. Grey literature was also searched.Eligibility criteria for selected studies: Templates published after 1 January 1990 and up to 19 March 2012. Non-English language literature, except Scandinavian; literature without an available abstract; and literature reporting only psychological aspects were excluded.The main database search identified 8497 articles, among which 8389 were excluded based on title and abstract. An additional 96 were excluded based on the full-text. The remaining 12 articles were included in the analysis. A total of 107 articles were identified in the grey literature and excluded. The reference lists for the included articles identified five additional articles. A relevant article published after completing the search was also included. In the 18 articles included in the study, 10 different templates or sets of data are described: 2 methodologies for assessing major incident responses, 3 templates intended for reporting from exercises, 2 guidelines for reporting in medical journals, 2 analyses of previous disasters and 1 Utstein-style template.More than one template exists for generating reports. The limitations of the existing templates involve internal and external validity, and none of them have been tested for feasibility in real-life incidents.
展开▼
机译:识别和描述用于报告院前重大事件医疗管理的模板的内容。根据PRISMA指南进行系统的文献综述。PubMed/ MEDLINE,EMBASE,CINAHL,Scopus和Web of Knowledge。还检索了灰色文献。所选研究的资格标准:1990年1月1日后至2012年3月19日出版的模板。没有可用摘要的文献;在主要数据库搜索中,检索到8497篇文章,其中8389篇被排除在标题和摘要的基础上。基于全文,另外的96个被排除在外。其余12篇文章包括在分析中。灰色文献中共有107篇文章被识别并被排除在外。所包含文章的参考列表确定了另外五篇文章。还包括完成搜索后发表的相关文章。在研究中包含的18篇文章中,描述了10种不同的模板或数据集:2种用于评估重大事件响应的方法,3种旨在从演习中报告的模板,2种在医学期刊中进行报告的指南,2种对先前灾难的分析和1种Utstein样式的模板。存在多个用于生成报告的模板。现有模板的局限性涉及内部和外部有效性,并且都没有针对现实事件中的可行性进行过测试。
展开▼